In a review, who must agree that the evaluation is not warranted?

In a review, who must agree that the evaluation is not warranted?

• A. The teacher and counselor
• B. The guardian and the education agency
• C. The student and guardian
• D. The principal and the district

Answer: (B)

The key idea is that whether an evaluation is warranted during a review is a decision made through the agreement of the guardian (or parent) and the education agency (the school district). The guardian represents the family’s rights and input, while the education agency holds the responsibility and authority to decide about conducting or not conducting evaluations. When both sides agree that an evaluation isn’t warranted, no further testing is pursued, preserving the parent’s rights and the district’s evaluative role. If they don’t agree, the process allows for follow-up steps and disputes to be addressed through appropriate procedures. The other pairs don’t carry the same formal role in making this specific determination.

The key idea is that whether an evaluation is warranted during a review is a decision made through the agreement of the guardian (or parent) and the education agency (the school district). The guardian represents the family’s rights and input, while the education agency holds the responsibility and authority to decide about conducting or not conducting evaluations. When both sides agree that an evaluation isn’t warranted, no further testing is pursued, preserving the parent’s rights and the district’s evaluative role. If they don’t agree, the process allows for follow-up steps and disputes to be addressed through appropriate procedures. The other pairs don’t carry the same formal role in making this specific determination.